The High Court took note of the submissions made by the husband that he shall continue to pay Rs 5,000 per month for a limited period for the wife and minor son. Resultantly, the Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned order. However, it was left open for the wife to take recourse to any other remedy as may be available under law. The husband was directed to pay a monthly sum of Rs 5,000 for a period of six months.
Vijayanand dattaram naik v. Vishranti vijayanand naik, 2019 SSC online bom 314, dated 13 February 2019
![You are currently viewing Vijayanand dattaram naik v. Vishranti vijayanand naik, 2019 SSC online bom 314, dated 13 February 2019](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/unnamed.png)
- Post published:December 14, 2021
- Post category:Domestic Violence
- Post comments:0 Comments
- Post last modified:December 14, 2021
You Might Also Like
![Read more about the article Domestic Violence – Nature of Allegations – Alleged Domestic Violence is committed in the year 1992, case is filed in the year 2012 – cannot be termed as DV : Bombay HC as on 11 March 2020](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)
Domestic Violence – Nature of Allegations – Alleged Domestic Violence is committed in the year 1992, case is filed in the year 2012 – cannot be termed as DV : Bombay HC as on 11 March 2020
![Read more about the article Sejal Dharmesh Ved vs The state of Maharashtra dated 7 march 2013 HC of Bombay](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)
Sejal Dharmesh Ved vs The state of Maharashtra dated 7 march 2013 HC of Bombay
![Read more about the article Hiral P. Harsora & Ors. v. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora & Ors., 6 October 2016](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/logo-final-psd-trn-271x300.png)