So far as cruelty alleged by the complainant is concerned, the complaint is once again vague and general ……..Though the complainant has stated that five months after the birth of the male child, he was turned out of the matrimonial home, she has not specified as to who has done so.”
Raj Pal Singh vs State Of Haryana on 26 April, 2000 HC of Punjab & Haryana
![You are currently viewing Raj Pal Singh vs State Of Haryana on 26 April, 2000 HC of Punjab & Haryana](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/498a-ipc.jpg)
- Post published:December 17, 2021
- Post category:498A
- Post comments:0 Comments
- Post last modified:December 17, 2021
You Might Also Like
![Read more about the article SC : Accused cannot be made to pay ad interim victim compensation by the High Court as a precondition to get anticipatory bail without reasonable justification](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)
SC : Accused cannot be made to pay ad interim victim compensation by the High Court as a precondition to get anticipatory bail without reasonable justification
![Read more about the article Sushil Kumar Sharma Versus Union of India in Supreme Court 19 July, 2005 SC Writ Petition Civ. 141 of 2005](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/498a-ipc-300x173.jpg)
Sushil Kumar Sharma Versus Union of India in Supreme Court 19 July, 2005 SC Writ Petition Civ. 141 of 2005
![Read more about the article Sher Singh And Ors. vs State Of Punjab And Anr. on 4 January, 2002 Punjab & Haryana HC](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/498a-ipc-300x173.jpg)