Thereafter of Divorce , the couple had never shared the household. The allegations were not pertaining to the period when they had lived together and, therefore, it cannot be said that the alleged act would be in the nature of domestic violence
Amitabh upadhyay Vs State of Maharashtra 25 september 2014 HC of Bombay Crl. Appeal No.1173/2013
![You are currently viewing Amitabh upadhyay Vs State of Maharashtra 25 september 2014 HC of Bombay Crl. Appeal No.1173/2013](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/unnamed.png)
- Post published:December 14, 2021
- Post category:Domestic Violence
- Post comments:0 Comments
- Post last modified:December 14, 2021
Tags: Domestic Violence, DV after 5 Year of Divorce, Fake Domestic Violence, Misuse of Domestic Violence act, Time Limitation DV
You Might Also Like
![Read more about the article Maintenance granted U/S 12 of DV act cannot be enhanced U/S 127 CrPc : karnatka HC ( Shivanand S/O Karabasappa Gurannavar v. Basavva @ Laxmi W/O Shivanand Gurannavar )](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)
Maintenance granted U/S 12 of DV act cannot be enhanced U/S 127 CrPc : karnatka HC ( Shivanand S/O Karabasappa Gurannavar v. Basavva @ Laxmi W/O Shivanand Gurannavar )
![Read more about the article Sejal Dharmesh Ved vs The state of Maharashtra dated 7 march 2013 HC of Bombay](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)
Sejal Dharmesh Ved vs The state of Maharashtra dated 7 march 2013 HC of Bombay
![Read more about the article Maintenance denied to Highly qualified wife , who approach the Ld. court with unclean hands : DHC as on 21 September 2023](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/court-bar.jpeg)