A spouse who is well qualified to get the service immediately with less efforts is not expected to remain idle to squeeze out, to milk out the other spouse by relieving him of his or her own purse by a cut in the nature of pendent lite alimony. The law does not expect the increasing number of such idle persons who by remaining in the arena of legal battles, try to squeeze out the adversary by implementing the provisions of law suitable to their purpose.
Damanpreet Kaur vs Indermeet Juneja & Anr. on 14 May, 2012 HC of Delhi CRL. REV.P. 344/2011
![You are currently viewing Damanpreet Kaur vs Indermeet Juneja & Anr. on 14 May, 2012 HC of Delhi CRL. REV.P. 344/2011](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court.webp)
- Post published:December 14, 2021
- Post category:Domestic Violence
- Post comments:0 Comments
- Post last modified:December 14, 2021
You Might Also Like
![Read more about the article Manish Jain vs Akanksha Jain on 30 March, 2017 Civil Appeal No. 4615 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.7670 of 2014](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/unnamed.png)
Manish Jain vs Akanksha Jain on 30 March, 2017 Civil Appeal No. 4615 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.7670 of 2014
![Read more about the article Krishnamurthy Nookula vs Savitha Y on 9 December, 2009 HC of Karnataka](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)
Krishnamurthy Nookula vs Savitha Y on 9 December, 2009 HC of Karnataka
![Read more about the article Domestic Violence – Nature of Allegations – Alleged Domestic Violence is committed in the year 1992, case is filed in the year 2012 – cannot be termed as DV : Bombay HC as on 11 March 2020](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)